Both my kids are at the age where they notice when someone is 'dissed' by another person.
I am sure they would see the 'dis' in WikiPedia's treatment of Joseph Farah. Read about that treatment here.
Apart from being a DisiPedia, WikiPedia is also a WikiPornia! So, instead of visiting WickedPedia, rather visit ConservaPedia!
That is the question!
Probably under the guise of "neutrality" and that it is an "encyclopaedia," WikiPedia WikiPornia, is punting all kinds of deviant sexual "information" that is very explicit.
In a WorldNetDaily article called Is Wikipedia wicked porn?, this so-called sexual "research" material on WikiPornia is written about as follows:"One Wikipedia entry states, 'A fluffer is a hired member of the crew of a pornographic movie whose role on the set is to sexually arouse the male participants prior to the filming of scenes requiring erections.'
A photo of two nude men having anal sex on a bed, and a 'fluffer' handing them a towel, is shown to the right of the entry."
The article also says:"The site even boasts a 'porn star' award template for 'outstanding contributions to pornography articles on Wikipedia,' awarded by Wikipedia: WikiProject Pornography."
According to WorldNetDaily, Jay Walsh, head of communications for the Wikimedia foundation, claimed that they do not censor any of their content. That is categorically false! Read this.
Also read Naked young girl photo troubles 'Wikipedophilia' at WorldNetDaily.
When you want to know something, do you quickly pop over to WikiPedia to find out more? Well, many have done so before.
However, WikiPedia is not as independent as one would want to believe. Not when it comes to the whole Global Warming Doomsday Theory.
Read about how they do it at WikiPedia here.
 |
Subscribe to my blogs |
Posts
All Comments
